A great victory took place in the fight against the corruption and occult influence that has been leading the strange trials against MISA and its spiritual guide Mr. Gregorian Bivolaru (whom many also call Grieg). FRIDAY THE COURT DECIDED THAT GREGORIAN BIVOLARU IS INNOCENT!

After long speculations and endless attempts to manipulate the judicial system into delivering a sentence that incriminates Grieg and after his lawyers had to move the trial to another city in the hope that the local judicial system would be more transparent and less corrupted, the final act came: all the accusations were dropped and the case is closed!
The decision taken by the court on Friday is in the same direction as the decision of the Supreme Court of Stockholm of 2006.
Yet, even now, after the verdict was officially released by the court, some of Romania’s biggest newspapers tried to put a spin on the news, claiming that the trial ended just because the time expired and not because the court decided that Grieg is innocent! In this context, Mihai Stoian, the coordinating teacher of Natha Yogacenter in Denmark and a student of Grieg, was quoted saying  ‘’HOW MANY TRIALS HAVE TO END IN MISA AND GRIEG’S FAVOR, HOW MANY COURTS HAVE TO DECLARE THEM INNOCENT FOR JUSTICE TO BE MADE AND THE HARRASMENT TO STOP?’’

An excellent two stages interview made by one of the reporters from NATHA.NET with the director of Sublime Erotica, the company that was at the center of one of the allegations against NATHA by the Danish Jyllands Posten.

Until  recently, Maria Porsfelt was known mostly as an inspiring teacher of Yoga, Tantra and meditation in Natha Yogacenter. However, in its Sunday issue on 31st May, Jyllands Posten newspaper tried to connect her name with a new scandal (they are trying to create) with the purpose of again attacking the Yoga school. To clarify this matter I contacted Maria and asked her some questions. She was kind, and over a telephone interview she openly and honestly shared her thoughts and feelings on the matter. Here is the interview:

 A recorded discussion

Since JP published the first in their series of defamatory articles about Natha on 24th May, Natha has been trying to get its reply printed in the paper, as guaranteed by law and democracy – or so we thought! Natha sent a reply to JP’s first article, and JP refused to publish it, using the bureaucratic excuse that the reply was not formulated according to the formal way the law stipulates.